release: bump version to 0.43.0

This commit is contained in:
linkong
2026-04-28 16:10:17 +08:00
parent 1cd2dab0ee
commit ac69d5d354
69 changed files with 6954 additions and 1141 deletions

View File

@@ -21,6 +21,19 @@ If the user specifies a file or directory, check only that. Otherwise check all
Only report issues present in **newly added or modified** lines of this diff — do not audit unchanged code.
## Token-Saving Rule
Prefer deterministic CLI checks before reading files into model context:
```bash
git diff --name-only HEAD
git diff --unified=0 HEAD -- <path>
git diff --check
rg -n "TODO|FIXME|console\.log|debugger|print\(" <changed-paths>
```
Read full files only when the focused diff does not provide enough surrounding context to make a safe edit.
## Checklist
### 1. Duplicate Logic
@@ -64,7 +77,13 @@ Filter to the user-specified path if one was provided.
### Step 2 — Read and analyze each file
Read the full file (not just the diff) with the Read tool. For each file, record every issue found: filename, line number, category, and suggested fix.
Start with focused diffs:
```bash
git diff --unified=0 HEAD -- <file>
```
Use `rg`, `git diff --check`, and compiler/linter output for deterministic findings. Read the full file only for files that need surrounding context. For each issue found, record filename, line number, category, and suggested fix.
### Step 3 — Report findings before touching anything
@@ -99,6 +118,7 @@ Principles:
- Only fix issues identified in the checklist — no extra improvements
- Keep each Edit as small as possible
- After fixing, verify the old bad pattern is gone with grep
- Prefer `apply_patch` for targeted edits; use formatters only when the repository already uses them for the touched file type
### Step 5 — Summary

117
.codex/skills/docs/SKILL.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
---
name: docs
description: Analyze current Planet repo changes and create or update technical documentation under docs/technical/zh. Use when the user asks to write docs, update technical docs, summarize implementation changes into documentation, or port the Claude docs-codex workflow into Codex.
---
# Docs
Use this skill when the user asks to create or update Planet technical documentation, especially under `docs/technical/zh/`.
## Goal
Write or update technical docs that explain why a change exists, not only what files changed.
Default target directory:
- `docs/technical/zh/`
## Workflow
1. Gather change context:
```bash
git diff HEAD --stat
git diff HEAD --name-only
git log --oneline -10
ls docs/technical/zh/
```
If the user gives a specific topic, focus on that topic. Otherwise infer the documentation topic from the file list and diff stat. Do **not** read the full repository diff by default; inspect focused diffs only for the files that define the doc topic:
```bash
git diff HEAD -- <path>
rg -n "class |def |function |export |router|@router|interface |type " <path>
```
2. Decide document scope:
- Use one document for one coherent topic.
- Split documents when the changes cross meaningful domains, such as backend performance and ops startup behavior.
- Prefer updating an existing relevant doc over creating a duplicate.
- Name new files as lowercase hyphenated `domain-topic-detail.md`, for example:
- `backend-datasources-api-performance.md`
- `ops-planet-sh-startup.md`
- `earth-bgp-context.md`
3. Write the doc in Chinese:
- Write Chinese prose for `docs/technical/zh/`.
- Keep technical identifiers, API paths, config keys, code symbols, and standard product names in English where appropriate.
- Use `##` and `###` headings; avoid going deeper than three levels.
- Use fenced code blocks with language tags.
- Use tables when comparing options or listing parameters.
4. Required content:
- Background/problem: what was wrong before and why the change was needed.
- Core design decisions and rationale.
- Key code snippets, preferably before/after or focused excerpts.
- Related files and what each file contributes.
5. Verification:
- Read the completed doc and check that the reasoning is clear.
- Verify important referenced paths exist.
- Use `rg --files` or `test -e` for path existence instead of relying on memory.
- Run a quick duplicate-language check when editing bilingual docs:
```bash
python - <<'PY'
from pathlib import Path
same = []
for en in sorted(Path("docs/technical/en").glob("*.md")):
zh = Path("docs/technical/zh") / en.name
if zh.exists() and en.read_text() == zh.read_text():
same.append(en.name)
if same:
raise SystemExit("identical en/zh docs: " + ", ".join(same))
print("no identical en/zh docs")
PY
```
Also check that Chinese docs do not link to the old language-less technical docs path:
```bash
rg -n "/home/ray/dev/linkong/planet/docs/technical/(?!zh|en)" docs/technical/zh --pcre2
```
This command should return no matches.
If checking many links, prefer deterministic extraction:
```bash
rg -n "\]\(([^)]+)\)" docs/technical/zh/<doc>.md
```
## Hard Constraints
- A file under `docs/technical/zh/` must not be an English source file copied as a placeholder.
- Do not leave a Chinese doc with only an English title and English first-screen content.
- When an English counterpart exists in `docs/technical/en/`, never duplicate it byte-for-byte into `docs/technical/zh/`.
- Internal links inside `docs/technical/zh/` should point to `docs/technical/zh/...` for Chinese docs, unless intentionally linking to an English-only file.
- Do not reference PR numbers, issue numbers, or the current conversation.
- Do not write changelog-style lists like "changed A, changed B, changed C" without the constraints and tradeoffs behind those changes.
- Keep code snippets concise and relevant.
## Recommended Output
After editing, summarize:
```md
Updated:
- docs/technical/zh/example.md — what changed
Verified:
- no identical en/zh docs
- no language-less docs/technical links in zh docs
```

View File

@@ -72,6 +72,8 @@ In Codex, only use actual subagents when the user explicitly asks for delegation
## Operating Rules
- Prefer objective checks over self-reported completion.
- Prefer deterministic tool evidence over long model summaries: use `rg`, `git diff --stat`, targeted `git diff -- <path>`, tests, builds, linters, `curl`, or database queries when they can prove a criterion.
- Do not paste large command output into the conversation; summarize the evidence and keep raw output in tool calls.
- Do not confuse progress with completion.
- If the worker says "done", verify it.
- If verification fails, continue from the gap instead of restarting blindly.

View File

@@ -35,6 +35,19 @@ Use `git rev-parse --show-toplevel` to get the repo root. All paths are relative
- `docs/CHANGELOG.md`
- `docs/version-history.md`
## Token-Saving Rule
Release work should be driven by deterministic CLI evidence. Prefer compact commands and targeted file reads:
```bash
git status --short
git diff --stat HEAD
git diff --name-only HEAD
rg -n "version|^## |^Released:|current" VERSION frontend/package.json pyproject.toml docs/CHANGELOG.md docs/version-history.md
```
Do not inspect full diffs unless deciding whether changed code belongs in the release.
## Workflow
### Step 1 — Environment check
@@ -52,7 +65,7 @@ If unrelated uncommitted changes exist, list them and ask the user whether to in
### Step 2 — Determine release type and next version
- If the user provided an explicit type (`feature` / `bugfix`), use it
- Otherwise infer from `git diff HEAD` and recent `git log`
- Otherwise infer from `git diff --stat HEAD`, `git diff --name-only HEAD`, focused diffs for changed code, and recent `git log`
- Compute the next version:
- `feature`: increment minor and reset patch to `0` (e.g. `0.41.2``0.42.0`)
- `bugfix`: increment patch only (e.g. `0.26.2``0.26.3`)
@@ -106,12 +119,13 @@ Get today's date with `date +%Y-%m-%d`.
Run the smallest relevant validation for the changes in scope:
- Python files changed: `python3 -m py_compile <changed_files>`
- Frontend files changed: run the project-standard check if available; otherwise skip and say so
- Python files changed: list changed Python files with `git diff --name-only HEAD -- '*.py'`, then run `python3 -m py_compile <changed_files>`
- Frontend files changed: list changed frontend files with `git diff --name-only HEAD -- frontend`, then run the project-standard check if available; otherwise skip and say so
- Version consistency: confirm VERSION, package.json, pyproject.toml, and uv.lock all show the same version
```bash
grep -h "version" VERSION frontend/package.json pyproject.toml
cat VERSION
rg -n "\"version\":|^version =|version = " frontend/package.json pyproject.toml uv.lock
```
### Step 7 — Pre-commit preview